I see believers in the Globe Earth, constantly referring to objects that are in the sky, whenever they are presented with evidence from experiments that prove the earth to be impossibly flatter than it should be according to the Globe Earth model.
But this is ridiculous. We are showing them measurable physical evidence of the earth's flatness. So why refer us to the sun, moon, stars and "planets" which they've never touched nor seen up close? Nobody really knows what the celestial objects are made of, nor how heavy they are, nor how big they are, nor how far they are, so any UNPROVEN assumptions about them are irrelevant in proving the physical roundness and physical rotation of the earth.
And space agencies are given enough money to go on real missions, make real measurements, and show us real footages to validate the Globe Earth model; but instead, they fake every single one of them using computer software and other film tricks; this wouldn't be necessary, unless the physical roundness and physical rotation of the earth, do not exist.
Here are. . .
Top 6 ABSENT PROOFS that wouldn't always be faked by well-paid space agencies, unless there is no physical roundness and rotation of the earth that can be observed and photographed:
1) The diameters, masses, and chemical compositions of the sun, moon, stars, and "planets", have never been physically measured nor observed FROM UP CLOSE; and the distances from the surface of the earth to the surfaces of these celestial objects, have never been traveled; so if we put rumors, assumptions, and fraudulently altered computer graphics aside, there is no proof of any celestial object being bigger or denser than the earth, nor proof of any celestial object being composed of soil or gases, nor proof of any celestial object being millions of miles away from the earth.
2) No moon, planet, artificial satellite, star, shooting star, nor comet, has ever been observed moving in a curved path either 360° or even 180° around another object that is in the sky, within a period of 12 hours or less, in real time; and the positions of the sun, moon, stars and "planets", have never been observed throughout a 24-hour period, from a non-inertial, non-rotating, stationary frame of reference; so if we put rumors, assumptions, and fraudulently altered computer graphics aside, there is no proof of celestial orbits.
3) Objects exert a force towards the ground, which we call weight; but the strength of this so-called "gravitational force of attraction" has never been proven to increase or decrease depending on the mass of the earth, nor has it ever been proven to depend on the square of the distance between the center of the earth and the center of another object; so if we put rumors, assumptions, and fraudulently altered computer graphics aside, there is no proof of the so-called "Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation", (i.e. there is no proof of an object being easier to lift from the highest mountain on the earth, than it is to lift it from the deepest hole on the earth, or than it is to lift it from any other distance for that matter).
4) A harmless unguided tour all the way around the coast of Antarctica, or a harmless unguided tour all the way across the circumference of Antarctica, should be allowed and even encouraged by governmental agencies, if they were not actually hiding the shape and size of Antarctica; instead, these types of non-threatening tours are either unreasonably prohibited or strictly guided; so if we put rumors, assumptions, and fraudulently altered computer graphics aside, there is no proof of Antarctica being 2,800 miles (or 4,500 kilometers) in diameter, and there is also no proof of Antarctica being an isolated land that is surrounded by the other known continents of the earth.
5) The true horizon always appears horizontal or flat from high altitudes, when not viewed through a distortive medium, such as a wide-angle camera lens or distortive window glass; so if we put the distortions of wide-angle lenses, rumors, assumptions, and fraudulently altered computer graphics aside, there is no proof of a curved horizon.
6) No rotation nor revolution of the earth, has ever been observed from a non-inertial, non-rotating, stationary frame of reference; so if we put rumors, assumptions, and fraudulently altered computer graphics aside, there is no proof of the earth rotating, revolving nor traveling in any other type of motion.
